Hey what gives? I didn't see my name on that list.

anyone else get the heebiejeebies about this guy?

122?!!!!... Crap

I actually agree with his idea to only let the smartest people have kids. After all, the smartest people tend to have less children, which creates general IQ lowering.

But I may be biased because my IQ is apparently 151, according to that test. That's almost enough to qualify me for the list of smartest people alive.

Oh, trust me.. my ex was on the lower end of the scale and so was his first wife, and it showed in the children...

and my new hubby, which I will "breed" with, is at least 10-15pts higher than me and we're very much looking forward to nerdy kids.

However, I don't think that people should have to apply...and/or be rejected based on IQ. It takes all kinds to make the world go 'round. We NEED all levels of intellect.

Precisely what need do we have for a mentally retarded person who is incapable of speech or basic motor capability?

There is a difference between mental retardation which is caused by birth defects and a low IQ.

My ex was a mechanic. He knew his trade, but couldn't spell. He was actually excellent at what he did...

God forbid we have ONLY "geniuses" and no one to work in the service industry.

If everyone was a genius, I wouldn't be very surprised to see robots within a few years doing all service-industry jobs.

I'd be curious what your plan for the economy would be if that were the case.

A large percentage of people would work in research and development. There would be greater demand for power generation, which would be filled by more people designing hydroelectric power stations.